![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NMRPredict:
|
|
NMRPredict versus ACD CNMR/PredictorACD published on its website a paper named "NMR Prediction Accuracy Validation" , where they claimed to compare their CNMR/Predictor with our NMRPredict software. This "comparison" was based on a webpage published by Wolfgang Robien , where he obtained a deviation of 2.22/2.19 ppm using the NMRShiftDB-dataset . Wolfgang Robien clearly stated on his webpage, that this result was obtained using his CSEARCH program. This can be easily seen from the embedded screenshots. NMRPredict uses within its prediction engines - based on HOSE-code and Neural Network technology - the same algorithms which are in use within CSEARCH. However, thanks to the collaboration between Wolfgang Robien and our development team, a few dramatic improvements have been implemented into NMRPredict. NMRPredict and CSEARCH:
Now the results:
For this evaluation the combined databases from CSEARCH and SPECINFO holding a total of 345,308 reference spectra were used. Based on this higher number of reference spectra a somewhat higher structural overlap between our databases and the NMRShiftDB-testdata has been detected. In order to compensate for this, we have recalculated our overall average deviation of 1.40 ppm using the lower structural overlap as detected by ACD. The value of 1.40 ppm corresponds to 92,927 known carbon environments and 121,209 unknown carbon environments - without this compensation our overall average deviation would be slightly better, but a comparison with ACD's results would be impossible. |